The Rise of South-South Trade: A Challenge for Sustainable Agriculture

Trade in agricultural commodities between southern countries is booming, but with a lack of sustainability standards, a crisis is brewing

Patterns of trade and the distribution of market power in the global economy are shifting – rapidly. In the past, most trade in agricultural commodities occurred between the countries of the global south (sites of production) and the countries of the global north (sites of consumption).

But, in recent years, the volume of south-south trade has increased significantly. Today, some of the environmentally most problematic crops such as soya and palm oil are predominantly traded amongst southern countries. With a total import volume of 63m tonnes in 2013, China is now by far the largest buyer of internationally traded soya, and India’s share of the global palm oil trade is estimated to have reached 20% (China 16%,  EU 14%).

The booming demand for soya and palm oil in emerging markets has further fueled agricultural expansion, deforestation, and biodiversity loss in producer countries such as Brazil, Indonesia, and Malaysia – creating a new sustainability crisis in the global south.

The mechanisms of change:

Over the last two decades, voluntary standards systems have emerged as an important mechanism in addressing the negative externalities of transnational production, as they are less constrained by national borders and rules of the international free trade regime than public regulators.

In agriculture, private sustainability initiatives are now an integral part of the emerging global governance. WWF’s round table initiatives in key agricultural sectors such as palm oil,  soya,  sugarcane and cotton are a good example. Different from organic labels and the fair trade movement, which focus on price premiums and niche markets, they are mainstream platforms designed to shift the entire sector toward more sustainable practices.

Against this background, WWF seeks to engage the top 100 influential companies which between them control 25% of the trade in these commodities in its round table initiatives. By doing this, the NGO hopes to significantly reduce the environmental impact of agricultural activity.

Ultimately, the model’s success rests on the market power of big brands. Incentivised through reputational and regulatory pressures as well as demand for sustainable products in northern consumer markets, they engage in private initiatives and implement their standards in their global supply networks.

Can voluntary standards help?

Unfortunately, in their current form, voluntary standard systems are not well equipped to deal with this sustainability crisis in the global south. For the most part, they continue to operate on the basis a north-south trade model, trying to leverage the market power of northern consumers and big brand companies.

However, the effectiveness of this model is increasingly undermined by the changing nature of agricultural trade. India and the palm oil sector are a good example. Earlier this year, the Centre for Responsible Business (CRB) published a study examining the market uptake of “sustainable” palm oil in India. It found that Indian companies lack incentives to source sustainably.

The industry’s major voluntary scheme, the Round table on Responsible Palm Oil (RSPO), has very little traction in this. In 2013 India imported a total of 8.67m metric tonnes of crude palm oil – mostly from Indonesia and Malaysia – of which only 144 tonnes were RSPO certified (0.0016%). For obvious reasons such figures are a problem for an initiative created to protect the rainforests of Sumatra and Borneo.

Why doesn’t the model work?

The answer lies in the nature of south-south trade and the specific characteristics of these markets. In the Indian context, two factors seem significant. Firstly, brands only play a minor role. According to the study conducted by CBS, palm oil in India is sold primarily (89%) in loose form and only a very small percentage (11%) enters the market in the branded and packaged form. Secondly, palm oil in India, also termed poor man’s oil, is highly price sensitive. As a result, companies have very small profit margins and therefore, in the current market environment, pricing takes precedence over sustainability concerns. This means that in the south-south trade setting described above, key conditions necessary for the RSPO to gain market traction are currently missing.

This might change over time. The market share of branded companies – Indian or foreign – is likely to increase as the country continues on its development path. Also, the growing middle class in India will become increasingly aware of sustainability issues, creating local demand for sustainable palm oil and other agricultural products.

Unfortunately, by then it might be too late for the rainforests in Sumatra and Borneo, which are vanishing at a breathtaking speed (the deforestation rate in Indonesia is estimated to currently amount to 1.17m hectares per annum). Therefore, we urgently need new models and strategies to address the south’s sustainability crisis.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s